Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Mariyam's column >>

MARIYAM

...until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream..."
Articles Posted: 47  Links Seeded: 43
Member Since: 10/2008  Last Seen: 5/20/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Sigue, a San Fernando, California Company, is Fined $12,000,000 for Violations of the Bank Secrecy Act

Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:39 AM EDT
business, irs, sox, usa-patriot-act, bsa, sar, bank-secrecy-act, glba, financial-crimes-enforcement-network, sarbane-oxley-act, suspicious-activity-report, graham-leach-bliley-financial-services-modernization-act, sigue, treasury-departy
By Mariyam
Advertise | AdChoices

" Under the authority of the Bank Secrecy Act and the regulations issued pursuant to that Act, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has determined that a civil money penalty is due for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, as described in this ASSESSMENT.

Based on the seriousness of the violations at issue in this matter, and the financial resources available to Sigue, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has determined that the appropriate penalty in this matter is $12,000,000.

Excerpt:
"B.

    Violations of the Requirement to Implement an Anti-Money Laundering Program

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network has determined that Sigue violated the requirement to establish and implement an effective anti-money laundering program. Since July 24, 2002, the Bank Secrecy Act and it's implementing regulations have required money services businesses to establish and implement anti-money laundering programs. An effective program is one that is reasonably designed to prevent the money services business from being used to facilitate money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities.4 The regulation requires money services businesses to implement written anti-money laundering programs that, at a minimum" (1) incorporate policies, procedures and internal controls reasonably designed to ensure ongoing compliance; (2) designate a person to assure day-to-day compliance; (3) provide training of appropriate personnel; and (4) provide for independent review to monitor and maintain an adequate program.5 The failure ot establish and implement an effective anti-money laundering program disabled management at Sigue from implementing measures to respond to continued patterns of suspicious activity, wityh repeated common characteristics, at certain agent locations."

Continued here: http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/ea/files/sigue_assement_final.pdf

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Mariyam's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Counterterrorism
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (5)
Mariyam

I find this news disturbing on several levels. First & foremost is because I was working for Sigue as part of a software development team who had already completed one version of a software application to do exactly this - ensure that they remained compliant with all local, state and federal laws including compliance for financial institutions including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), Graham-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (GLBA), and the new provisions required by the USA Patriot Act. (this was in Fall 2003) .

Not only were we required to attend a formal class on compliance, we also had to sign a document acknowledging we had received the instructions.
And we met with several individuals who represented the various industries (state of California and Federal), who lavished praise of the application "we" had developed. In fact, they told us that they were so impressed with it, that they intended to use it as an example for others to imitate.

I can't imagine what actually happened but can't help wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that Sigue's customer base is almost exclusively Latino and most of the transactions were outgoing.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:40 AM EDT
chenyl62Deleted
sdfshdkDeleted
ann in Texas

Hi Mariyam. From page 3 of the PDF you linked:

As a result, on multiple occasions over an extended period of time, 47 agents assisted remitters in the structuring of transactions to avoid reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. Specifically, during single business days, certain agents knowingly facilitated or instructed remitters to break down cash transactions into smaller amounts and/or provide multiple false names to avoid the currency transaction reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act. This conduct deprived law enforcement and other authorities of accurate, complete and valuable information that would have otherwise appeared on currency transaction reports required by the Bank Secrecy Act.

It also said the company failed to put anyone in charge of compliance or assure that adequate training was in place, especially for higher ups.

So, to address your concerns, it is likely that the software you helped created was compliant. But the company knew and took advantage of the loopholes, encouraging customers to use mulitple fake names and break large amounts of transfers to smaller amounts that wouldn't raise flags.

Glad to know of this. The action taken my the treasury and the fines seem fair to me. Thank you for sharing.

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:52 AM EDT
Mariyam

I didn't know Sigue had this kind of money to throw away on fines like that. I'm just said that all of the time, effort, and money they invested in that application sounds like it just went to waste.

Thank you both for your contributions to my article :-)

  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:42 AM EDT
ann in Texas

Hi Maryiam :) I wouldn't say the application you helped develop failed at all. I would say the company failed in choosing not to adhere to compliance regulations, and got caught.

The fine appears to be a drop in the bucket to Sigue. I found that they purchased Coinstar's money transfer business just last month for $41.5 million. A year back they bought another company, Envios El Cid. They are not hurting for cash.

According to Sigue's website, their CEO was named California's 2009 Entreprenuer of the Year! And the site includes a nice page dedicated to regulatory compliance.

It sounds like you take pride in the work you did for the company and were a good employee. It's unfortunate that your ethics weren't mirrored by those at the top.

  • 1 vote
#4.2 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:23 AM EDT
Reply
O-1958217

As technology in general and the Internet in particular become a more important part of how virtually all companies do business, many are finding themselves faced with new ethical dilemmas.

Take for example when New York-based Internet advertising company DoubleClick Inc. made plans to share customer information with an off-line marketing firm last year. Consumer advocates were up in arms that DoubleClick would betray such "confidential" information. The controversy not only tarnished the company's name, but also raised a host of Internet privacy issues that e-commerce companies could no longer avoid.

When Toysmart.com Inc. pulled the plug on its operations this summer and offered its online customer list for sale, a similar situation arose. Regulators reacted by threatening to block any such sale because it would violate a privacy agreement with those customers.

(http://mjhon2003.newsvine.com/_news/2010/09/10/5086444-e-business-ethics; Zachary Tobias put finely 'putting the ethics in e-business' (November 6, 2000) (Computerworld))

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Sep 20, 2010 7:34 AM EDT
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com